Best Of

Best Video Hosting with Analytics in 2026

6 platforms compared for viewer engagement data and performance tracking

How We Evaluated

  • Depth of viewer engagement data: play rate, completion, drop-off
  • Per-viewer tracking vs aggregate-only metrics
  • Heatmap and attention analysis capabilities
  • CRM and marketing tool integrations for analytics data
  • Real-time vs delayed reporting

The Best Options

1. host.video (Top Pick)

Video hosting with built-in analytics, AI search, and auto transcription. Track how viewers engage with your content and let them search inside videos to find what they need.

Pricing: Starter $20/mo ($200/yr), Business $100/mo ($1,000/yr), Custom from $5,000/yr

Pros

  • Analytics included on all plans at no extra cost
  • AI search inside videos shows what topics viewers care about
  • Auto transcription creates searchable engagement data
  • Flat pricing means analytics never cost extra

Cons

  • No per-viewer heatmaps yet
  • No native CRM integration for viewer data

2. Wistia

The analytics leader among video hosting platforms. Engagement heatmaps, A/B testing, per-viewer tracking, and deep CRM integrations.

Pricing: Free (10 videos, basic stats), Pro $79/mo, Advanced $319/mo

Pros

  • Per-viewer engagement heatmaps show exactly where attention drops
  • A/B testing for thumbnails, CTAs, and video variants
  • Native HubSpot, Marketo, Pardot, and Salesforce integrations
  • Embed location analytics show which pages drive engagement

Cons

  • $79/mo minimum for meaningful analytics
  • Analytics accuracy questioned by some G2 reviewers
  • Bandwidth capped at 1 TB

3. Vidyard

Sales-focused platform with per-viewer tracking tied directly to CRM records. Best for tracking which prospects watch your videos.

Pricing: Free (limited), paid tiers require sales contact

Pros

  • Per-viewer tracking linked to Salesforce and HubSpot contacts
  • Engagement data flows directly into sales pipelines
  • No bandwidth or library limits on paid plans

Cons

  • Opaque pricing requiring sales conversations
  • Platform UX described as clunky
  • Shifting focus toward AI avatars may deprioritize analytics

4. Mux

Developer-first video with Mux Data analytics built in. Quality-of-experience monitoring alongside content engagement metrics.

Pricing: Free (100K min), Pay As You Go $20/mo, Scale $500/mo

Pros

  • Mux Data included at no extra cost for quality-of-experience
  • Real-time monitoring of playback performance
  • Detailed per-video and per-viewer metrics via API
  • Multi-CDN analytics across delivery infrastructure

Cons

  • Analytics accessed via API or dashboard, not embeddable reports
  • No marketing-focused features like CTAs or email gates
  • Requires developer skills to use effectively

5. SproutVideo

Video host with per-viewer tracking, heatmaps, and exportable analytics. More affordable than Wistia for basic engagement data.

Pricing: Seed $10/mo, Sprout $35/mo, Tree $75/mo, Forest $295/mo

Pros

  • Per-viewer tracking with heatmaps
  • Exportable CSV data for custom reporting
  • Google Analytics integration
  • Starts at $10/mo

Cons

  • Analytics depth does not match Wistia or Vidyard
  • No A/B testing
  • No CRM integrations beyond Zapier

6. Brightcove

Enterprise analytics with engagement scoring, first-party data, and cross-platform tracking. The deepest analytics for large organizations.

Pricing: Starter ~$199/mo, Professional ~$500/mo, Enterprise custom

Pros

  • Engagement scoring across entire video libraries
  • First-party analytics with no third-party cookie dependency
  • Cross-platform tracking for multi-channel distribution
  • Integrates third-party analytics sources

Cons

  • Analytics only meaningful at enterprise scale
  • Sales-led pricing starting ~$199/mo
  • 85% staff reduction raises platform continuity risk

Quick Comparison

Platform Pricing Best For
host.video From $20/mo Analytics with AI search and flat pricing
Wistia From $79/mo Marketing teams needing heatmaps and A/B testing
Vidyard Contact sales Sales teams tracking prospect engagement in CRM
Mux From $20/mo Developers monitoring playback quality
SproutVideo From $10/mo Affordable per-viewer tracking
Brightcove From ~$199/mo Enterprise engagement scoring at scale

How to Choose

Define what you need analytics for. If you want to optimize marketing video conversion, Wistia and Vidyard have the deepest engagement data with CRM integrations. If you want to monitor playback quality and buffering across your infrastructure, Mux Data is the standard. If you want to understand what content viewers search for and engage with, look for platforms with in-video search analytics. SproutVideo offers solid basics at a low price. Most platforms offer aggregate metrics. Per-viewer tracking, heatmaps, and CRM integration are what separate analytics-focused platforms from the rest.

Try the top pick free

14-day free trial. No surprise bills.

Start your free trial