Alternatives

Best Brightcove Alternatives in 2026

Why teams are switching and what to look for

Why Teams Leave Brightcove

Bending Spoons acquisition gutted the company

Bending Spoons acquired Brightcove for $233M in February 2025. By March, 85% of staff (450 of ~530) had been laid off. Only ~80 employees remain as a skeleton crew through April 2026. Named customers like Revry and AFI have already left.

Opaque pricing and forced contracts

No pricing is published on the website. Starts around $199/mo with annual contracts required. Post-acquisition, customers report unclear billing and pressure to migrate to more expensive products. Setup costs can reach $10,000 or more.

Support has deteriorated

Product support underwent a complete overhaul post-acquisition and has deteriorated further. No single point of contact. Transition to automated support systems has left enterprise customers without the dedicated service they previously relied on.

Innovation is frozen

With engineering and product teams gutted, Brightcove appears to be a finished product in maintenance mode. No meaningful feature development is expected. Bending Spoons now owns both Brightcove and Vimeo, hollowing out two major incumbents simultaneously.

What to Look for in an Alternative

  • A platform with a stable, independent team investing in the product
  • Transparent pricing without long-term contract requirements
  • Enterprise-grade security without enterprise-grade complexity
  • Modern UX that does not require dedicated onboarding
  • AI features like search and transcription that reduce manual work

The Best Brightcove Alternatives

1. host.video (Our Pick)

Modern video hosting with flat pricing, AI search, and custom domains. A clean alternative to enterprise platforms that have stopped innovating.

Pricing: Starter $20/mo, Business $100/mo, Custom from $5,000/yr

Pros

  • Transparent pricing: Starter $20/mo, Business $100/mo
  • AI-powered search and auto transcription
  • Custom domains and white-label player included
  • No annual contracts on self-serve plans

Cons

  • No DRM (uses password protection and domain locking instead)
  • No built-in monetization features

2. Mux

API-first video infrastructure with built-in analytics. Used by engineering teams at Patreon, Substack, and Shopify.

Pricing: Usage-based, from $20/mo credit

Pros

  • Fast encoding and multi-CDN delivery
  • Quality-of-experience analytics included
  • Modular: use only what you need

Cons

  • Requires engineering to implement
  • No dashboard for non-technical users
  • Custom domains cost $200/mo extra

3. Wistia

Marketing video platform with analytics, lead capture, and CRM integrations.

Pricing: Pro $79/mo, Advanced $319/mo, Premium custom

Pros

  • Heatmaps, A/B testing, and engagement analytics
  • In-video CTAs and email gates
  • Privately held and bootstrapped; stable company

Cons

  • Per-video pricing; starts at $79/mo
  • 1 TB bandwidth cap on $319/mo plan
  • Marketing-only; limited for training or internal video

4. Kaltura

Enterprise video platform with LMS integrations, webinars, and virtual classrooms. Publicly traded on Nasdaq.

Pricing: Contact sales; starts ~$500/mo for mid-size

Pros

  • Deep LMS integrations: Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard
  • Webinar and virtual classroom products
  • Enterprise security with AES-256 and SSO

Cons

  • Universally described as clunky and complex
  • Opaque pricing; SMBs pay $500+/mo
  • Stock near all-time lows; CFO departed December 2025

5. Dacast

All-in-one streaming platform with live and VOD hosting, monetization, and white-label player.

Pricing: Starter $39/mo, Scale $165/mo (annual), Custom sales

Pros

  • Live + VOD in one platform
  • Built-in paywall with PPV, subscriptions, and ads
  • White-label player with CNAME on all plans

Cons

  • Aggressive auto-renewal policies; refunds refused
  • UI described as stuck in 2014
  • DRM locked to $165/mo Scale plan

6. JW Player (JWX)

Enterprise streaming and ad monetization platform. Merged with Connatix in 2024, rebranded as JWX in 2025.

Pricing: Contact sales; ~$4,200/yr via AWS Marketplace

Pros

  • Multi-format delivery across web, OTT, and CTV
  • DRM with Widevine, FairPlay, and PlayReady
  • Claims 99.999% uptime

Cons

  • Inflated storage billing; charges for all transcoded variants
  • Opaque pricing; entry via AWS Marketplace at $4,200/yr
  • Open-source player abandoned; marked "No Longer Maintained"

Quick Comparison

Platform Pricing Features Ease of Use
host.video From $20/mo flat AI search, transcription, HLS, custom domains, white-label Dashboard + API; quick setup
Mux Usage-based from $20/mo Video API, analytics, multi-CDN, AI tools API-only; requires engineering
Wistia From $79/mo, per-video Marketing analytics, CTAs, lead capture Dashboard; marketing-focused
Kaltura Contact sales, ~$500+/mo LMS integrations, webinars, enterprise security Complex; steep learning curve
Dacast From $39/mo + overages Live + VOD, monetization, white-label Dashboard; dated interface
JW Player (JWX) Contact sales, ~$4,200/yr DRM, multi-format, ad monetization Enterprise onboarding required

Our Recommendation

Brightcove customers are facing a platform in maintenance mode with no clear product roadmap. The move to a replacement should prioritize stability, transparent pricing, and a team that is actively building. host.video offers flat monthly pricing, AI-powered search and transcription, custom domains, and a modern dashboard that does not require enterprise onboarding. For teams that need to move quickly and confidently, it removes the uncertainty Brightcove now represents.

Try host.video free

14-day free trial. No surprise bills.

Start your free trial